Rich Ricci ‘delighted’ BetBright’s ante-post bets will now be honoured

‘The way the business world works had to take its course’

Rich Ricci, the former chairman of the defunct internet bookmaker BetBright, said on Friday that he is "delighted that we have found a solution", which guarantees that all outstanding ante-post bets with the firm will now be honoured by BetVictor.

BetBright sold its technology platform to rival firm 888.com in early March for £15 million, but its outstanding liabilities on bets already placed with the firm were not included in the deal. While 888.com agreed to honour bets on the Cheltenham Festival in mid-March, it declined to take on ante-post bets on the football season, which were believed to have a potential total liability of around £1 million depending on results.

Bets that were declared void with stakes returned included those placed by one BetBright customer with a potential return of nearly £27,000 for an initial stake of £400. The customer had a £100 each-way double on Luton (14-1) and Lincoln (10-1) to win League One and League Two respectively, and a £100 Trixie (three doubles and a treble) on Lincoln (4-1), Leeds United in the Championship (5-1) and Arbroath, now the runaway leaders of League One in Scotland, at 6-1.

Both Luton and Lincoln are now priced at around 2-9 to win their divisions, while Leeds are still competitive in the Championship at 11-2. The book has effectively closed on Arbroath.

READ MORE

Ricci, a leading owner in National Hunt racing, attracted fierce criticism after BetBright’s closure was announced, but now appears to have been working behind the scenes to get a fair deal for the firm’s customers.

“The way the business world works had to take its course,” Ricci said on Friday, “and there were technical issues why I couldn’t step in myself, not the least of which is that I’m not a bookmaker and so I needed a partner. So I’m delighted and really grateful to BetVictor that we have found a way to honour these bets.

“It was an unusual transaction and when these things happened, the directors had to take a decision in the interests of all the liability holders. It was a process that had to play out and I’m delighted that we have found a solution.” – Guardian