Bookie operators sued over alleged sports broadcast copyright infringement

A media company that provides horse racing and other sports broadcasts to betting shops is suing a father and daughter who run five bookmakers’ outlets.

Sis Media Ltd claims John and Laura Celine Patton, who run the AlphaBet chain of betting shops, in Borris, Co Carlow; Tubbercurry, Co Sligo; Manorhamilton, Co Leitrim; Main Street, Donegal town, and Kilkee, Co Clare, are in breach of copyright by showing copyrighted broadcasts in their shops.

Sis Media provides live feed channels called Sis One and Sis Two along with other sporting event content to bookies.

It says that between 2009 and 2017, it provided its services to AlphaBet but terminated it due to the non-payment by John Patton of fees of nearly €40,000 which it says remain outstanding. When it was discovered that three AlphaBet shops were still showing Sis broadcasts, the Pattons were warned to stop doing so. In September last year, Sis also objected to the renewal of Mr Patton’s bookies licence and gardaí said they would carry out enquiries.

Bruce Springsteen concert in Cork: Tell us your verdict

---

‘I do God’: London mayor Sadiq Khan on religious faith, meeting the Pope and the fight to save the planet

---

Billie Eilish: Hit Me Hard and Soft review – Her third album is not quite a genre bender, but this star is growing in sophistication

---

Rebel Spanish nuns split with Vatican amid property spat

---

On Monday, barrister Paul Coughlan, for Sis Media, was granted permission to have proceedings against the Pattons dealt with in the High Court’s fast-track commercial division.

Mr Patton, representing himself and Laura, who he said is the holder of the bookies licence, told the court Sis had refused to give a subscription for the channels to his daughter. Sis, he claimed, effectively “refused to engage with my daughter and are effectively shutting us out of business”. He said that when they offered to stop showing the Sis channels, Sis “came here with a whole fishing list” of other demands they could not meet for reasons including GDPR, he said.

Not only did they not have the money to pay for lawyers to represent them, they would not be able to pay for any damages or legal costs that might be awarded against them, he said.

Mr Justice Denis McDonald said the only issue before him was whether the case should be admitted to the Commercial Court. He said court rules required him to admit the case but urged the parties to try to resolve the matter. He adjourned it to next February.