:quality(70)/cloudfront-eu-central-1.images.arcpublishing.com/irishtimes/A7CPHTV4LXPBSXLYRGYEZCZLSA.jpg)
Former Derry City and Celtic footballer Patrick “Paddy” McCourt appeared at Derry Magistrate’s Court on Tuesday where he is contesting a charge of sexual assault.
McCourt (39) of Wheatfield Court in Muff, Co Donegal is charged with one count of sexual assault that is said to have occurred on January 30th 2022.
At the beginning of the trial, CCTV was shown of the alleged incident that was said to have occurred in Bar 57 in Derry’s Waterloo Street.
The alleged victim, a young woman, told the court she had been out drinking with friends. Accepting that she had had a few drinks the alleged victim said she “was a bit tipsy”. The woman said her boyfriend worked at the bar as did a friend of hers.
:quality(70)/cloudfront-eu-central-1.images.arcpublishing.com/irishtimes/YG66U2GBZFHNBO7ZWJ46NZAEGU.jpg)
:quality(70):focal(895x570:905x580)/cloudfront-eu-central-1.images.arcpublishing.com/irishtimes/Z7EGD53NHNBQZMJHM24XEENXOU.jpg)
:quality(70):focal(935x405:945x415)/cloudfront-eu-central-1.images.arcpublishing.com/irishtimes/IKA3EULCURGXVMSQ3HJMGDTF2M.jpg)
:quality(70):focal(4505x2795:4515x2805)/cloudfront-eu-central-1.images.arcpublishing.com/irishtimes/CY34JQ4LHZCYTA6IL2EPOO7ZSQ.JPG)
She told the court that she had gone to the bar and while there someone stuck their hand under her skirt at the back, touching her under her underwear.
The young woman said she was in shock after the incident and “froze” after it happened. “I didn’t give anyone permission to do that,” she said.
Eoghan Devlin, counsel for McCourt, said at the outset of his cross-examination that no one was disputing that the woman had been touched inappropriately.
He said that no one was suggesting that she was lying.
Mr Devlin asked her why she changed her statement saying that the incident occurred at 1.30am to say it had happened at 12.50am. The woman said that after checking her messages on her phone, she realised it could not have happened at 1.30am.
The woman also said another man present told her he didn’t agree with what had happened. Mr Devlin suggested to the woman that this man had been standing behind her and she agreed.
The barrister also suggested that in her messages to friends, she said that someone had stuck their “hands” up her skirt. The woman said at the time she was upset and distressed and used the phrase “hands” wrongly.
In her messages the woman also said that bouncers had “dragged” the defendant out after being on the scene in two seconds. Mr Devlin put it to her that the CCTV showed it was one minute and 20 seconds before the bouncers appeared.
The woman said that it “all happened so fast” and said she could have been mistaken about the time.
Mr Devlin also referred the woman to an interview she did with police in which she used the phrase “you stuck” to the other man, before changing it to “your friend stuck his hand”.
Beth Carroll, who worked in the bar, gave evidence of seeing the defendant “reach down putting his hand to the top of her leg”.
She told the court that she knew of McCourt but didn’t know him personally. The witness said she had seen the CCTV on the night in question.
Under cross-examination by Mr Devlin, Ms Carroll said that in her first statement she had talked about a man “walking behind” the alleged victim before putting his hand up her skirt and she accepted that this was wrong. She agreed McCourt had not been walking behind the woman but standing beside her.
The barrister put it to the witness that there was another man standing behind the alleged injured party not McCourt and she agreed.
It was suggested to Ms Carroll that there were things in her first statement that she knew were wrong “in a number of important ways” yet she didn’t contact the police. She agreed with the contention.
The trial continues.