Man challenges sex abuse findings against him by Tusla

Man accused of ‘luring’ boy into bed while they were working at a hotel 50 years ago

A man accused of sex abuse on a child while they were both working at a hotel 50 years ago has brought a High Court challenge to findings against him by Tusla, the Child and Family Agency.

The man, who it is claimed was about 17 at the time, allegedly engaged in sexual activity in 1969 or 1970 with the boy, who was about nine years old.

His accuser says he “lured him into bed” on three occasions in staff quarters in the hotel and told him afterwards not to tell anyone.

The complaint was investigated by gardaí but the DPP decided not to prosecute.

READ MORE

The man strongly denies the claims and is seeking a permanent injunction over the findings of Tusla.

The agency says its role is in assessing possible risk to other children and it has the lower “balance of probabilities” standard of proof for its investigations as against the criminal law’s “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard.

Tusla found what it called a “provisional conclusion” that the allegations were true and they became a full finding when it says the man declined to properly engage with it. The man took part in a Tusla appeals procedure which he then brought judicial review proceedings over.

He argued there was, among other things, a failure to properly examine the allegations and that he had been denied fair procedures.

The court heard on Tuesday the agency wants to complete a new appeal process but opposes the man’s application for a permanent injunction.

Mr Justice Garrett Simons heard the complainant first made a complaint to Tusla in 2013 and a year later to gardai which resulted in no prosecution. In 2018, the ageincy made its provisional conclusion.

Among the complainants claims are that as a result of the abuse he had a mental breakdown in his 20s and continued to have ongoing mental issues.

The accused denies the allegations and says they are motivated by malice associated with other day-to-day issues in the community they both live in.

The case continues.