South Africa's president Jacob Zuma survived a no-confidence vote on Thursday, after an anti-graft watchdog called in a report for a judicial inquiry into allegations of influence-peddling in the government.
The scandal highlighted in the report has rattled investors in Africa’s most industrialised country and raised the risk of a credit ratings downgrade of the country’s stagnating economy.
Mr Zuma (74) had the support of the African National Congress (ANC), which controls about two-thirds of the 400-member assembly. He has already survived a no-confidence motion and an impeachment vote this year, related to other scandals.
“I think the ‘noes’ have it,” deputy speaker Lechesa Tsenoli ruled, after ANC deputies voted against the motion and burst into song in support of Mr Zuma.
The main opposition Democratic Alliance, which called the no-confidence motion against Mr Zuma over what it described as his “reckless leadership”, asked for a re-count of the vote.
Mr Zuma, who was not in the assembly, won with 214 lawmakers voting against the motion, while 126 voted in favour and one abstained, a result that mirrored his victory in March.
‘Ill-conceived’
In his speech supporting the motion, the alliance party leader
Mmusi Maimane
urged deputies to “stand up against state capture”, while water and sanitation minister
Nomvula Mokonyane
said the motion was “ill-conceived and bound to fail.”
The vote comes after the public protector, a constitutionally-mandated office, called for a judicial inquiry into allegations of corruption in Mr Zuma's government in a report entitled State of Capture released last week.
Mr Zuma denies allegations that he granted undue influence to the Gupta family of business tycoons, who run a business empire from media to mining, or anyone else. The Guptas have also denied any wrongdoing.
– (Reuters)