Boy (8) settles case against HSE over birth with €500,000 interim payment

High Court heard that there were nine different attempts at intubation of newborn baby after his heartbeat plummeted shortly after birth at Midland Regional Hospital Portlaoise

An eight-year-old boy who sued over the care he received at the time of his birth at Midland Regional Hospital Portlaoise has settled his High Court action with a €500,000 interim payment.

At five minutes of age, the High Court heard, the baby’s heartbeat plummeted and he needed resuscitation. There were nine different attempts at intubation that took one hour, the court was told.

The boy’s senior counsel Jeremy Maher said it was their case that during that time the baby was deprived of oxygen.

The Health Service Executive (HSE) has denied liability and a full defence was filed. However, counsel said, a breach of duty was admitted in relation to the failure to intubate.

READ MORE

Counsel said that was the limit of the concessions made and the case had settled after mediation with an interim payment for the next 10 years.

The boy cannot be identified by order of the court. In proceedings taken through his mother, he sued the HSE claiming he has been allegedly compromised as a result of the care he received at Midland Regional Hospital, Portlaoise, after his premature birth in March 2015.

It was claimed the successful intubation of the baby was allegedly delayed until one hour of life and there was an alleged failure to ensure the expeditious intubation of the baby following his arrival in the special care baby unit.

The baby, it was claimed, had been transferred to the unit without ensuring his intubation and adequate ventilation during the transfer, resulting in the baby being noted as gasping on arrival.

It was further claimed that the baby suffered an encephalopathy associated with asphyxia and he was transferred to a Dublin hospital.

Mr Maher told the court it was an extremely complex case which he said related to the birth and neonatal care in relation to the child and also the admission of the mother to the hospital.

He said it was not a case involving an intellectual disability, but it was their case the child had been compromised. Mr Maher, instructed by Cian O’Carroll Solicitors, said an expert on their side contended the collapse of the baby’s respiratory system caused the alleged injury.

He said it was also their case the baby had been delivered two hours later than he should have been and the mother was vomiting blood and should have got certain steroids on admission to hospital to protect the baby’s lungs.

These claims were denied by the HSE, which contended that all measures taken were appropriate.

Approving the interim payment, Mr Justice Paul Coffey said it was a very complicated case and he accepted the interim settlement was fair and reasonable in relation to the litigation risk involved.

The case will come back before the court in 10 years’ time when other matters such as loss of earnings will be assessed.