Father-of-five guilty of manslaughter for feud-related stabbing

A father-of-five has been cleared of murder but found guilty of manslaughter for stabbing a man to death after he was attacked while walking home from a pub late at night.

The 10-person jury at the Central Criminal Court took just over three hours to reach their unanimous verdict following a three-week trial. Andrew Lacey had denied murdering Derek Reddin and told his trial that the deceased assaulted him with a metal baseball bat. The court heard that the assault arose out of an ongoing feud between associates of both the accused and the deceased.

Members of Mr Reddin’s family wept when the verdict was revealed. Ms Justice Mary Ellen Ring refused to extend Lacey’s bail and remanded him in custody ahead of a sentencing hearing next Thursday when members of Mr Reddin’s family will have an opportunity to make statements to the court.

Andrew Lacey (35) of Riverside, Loughlinstown, Co Dublin had pleaded not guilty to the murder of Derek Reddin (31) at Loughlinstown Drive on a date unknown between October 14th and October 15th, 2019, both dates inclusive.

Ransom ’79 review: Charlie Bird and the £5m plot to blackmail the Irish government

---

Interruptions undermine workplace focus and productivity

---

How long might commuters be waiting for the Dart to Drogheda?

---

From Nicola Coughlan’s hunks in landscaped gardens to Cillian Murphy’s gripping gangster romp: Patrick Freyne’s costume drama guide

---

David Howard told the trial that he brought his cousin, Mr Reddin, to Loughlinstown that night because Mr Reddin was to have a “straightener” or a “boxing match” with Lacey. Lacey was seen on CCTV leaving the Lough Inn pub with his friend Mark Roe at about 11.40pm and going to a nearby takeaway while Mr Howard and Mr Reddin waited on Loughlinstown Drive. Lacey and Mr Roe were walking along Loughlinstown Drive with their food when they encountered Mr Reddin and Mr Howard.

Lacey told the trial that Mr Reddin ran across the road and attacked him with a metal baseball bat leading to a scuffle in which Mr Reddin dropped the bat as they both fell to the ground. Lacey said he got up and took a knife from his pocket hoping to “repel” Mr Reddin or make him run away. However, he said Mr Reddin retrieved the bat and lunged at him again. He said they scuffled and again fell to the ground but he, Lacey, did not realise he had stabbed Mr Reddin.

He said the knife was in his pocket because he used it in his work as a general operative at a nearby park and had inadvertently left home with it that evening.

Mr Howard denied that Mr Reddin had a baseball bat and told the jury that Lacey produced the knife as soon as he saw Mr Reddin from across the road. He said he saw Lacey waving the knife while shouting “get it on” before the scuffle began. Mr Howard said he saw Mr Reddin fall to the ground before Lacey got on top of him. He said “he was straddling him and digging the knife into him. He had his two legs over his body, basically sitting on him”.

Defence counsel Dominic McGinn SC said that Mr Howard had given multiple versions of what happened, initially telling gardaí on the night that he was out walking with Mr Reddin when they “came across two lads” they didn’t know and a fight started. Three days later Mr Howard told gardaí that Mr Reddin was there for a “boxing match” with Lacey and that he saw Mr Reddin “pulling some kind of baton out of his trouser leg” when Lacey produced the knife. In his evidence before the jury Mr Howard denied that Mr Reddin had a baseball bat during the fight with Lacey.

Following the stabbing, Mr Reddin collapsed and a pathologist would tell the trial that he died from a stab wound that penetrated his lung and heart.

Lacey accepted that he lied to emergency services and continued to lie when he told a garda at the scene that one of his attackers had a knife and both had bats. He said he told gardai the truth the following day and said his version of what happened is the truth.

He denied that he deliberately “dug” the knife into Mr Reddin and insisted that he “didn’t mean to cause anyone any harm on that night”.

Ms Justice Ring told the jury that for a finding of murder the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Andrew Lacey intended to kill or to cause serious harm when he stabbed Mr Reddin. However, she said that if you kill somebody but are acting in reasonable self defence, that killing is not unlawful and the person would be guilty of no offence.

A manslaughter verdict would arise, she said, if Lacey used more force than was reasonably necessary but honestly believed at the time that the force he was using was necessary to defend himself.

The jury could also reach a manslaughter verdict if they found that Lacey was so intoxicated that he was unable to form an intent. The jury heard that Lacey had been drinking cider for about five hours before the stabbing.