Trial hears potential in foreign developments was not reason for granting Michael Lynn €3.65m loan

There was potential opportunity from former solicitor Michael Lynn’s property developments abroad, a former Ulster Bank worker has told his multi-million euro theft trial. But that was not the reason Mr Lynn was given a €3.65 million loan in 2007, Stephen McCarthy, former Ulster Bank relationship manager, told Dublin Circuit Criminal Court on Tuesday.

Mr Lynn (55), of Millbrook Court, Redcross, Co Wicklow is on trial accused of the theft of around €27 million from seven financial institutions. He has pleaded not guilty to 21 counts of theft in Dublin between October 23rd, 2006 and April 20th, 2007.

It is the prosecution’s case that Mr Lynn obtained multiple mortgages on the same properties, in a situation where banks were unaware that other institutions were also providing finance.

The financial institutions involved are Bank of Ireland, National Irish Bank (later known as Danske Bank), Irish Life and Permanent, Ulster Bank, ACC Bank, Bank of Scotland Ireland and Irish Nationwide Building Society.

Ransom ’79 review: Charlie Bird and the £5m plot to blackmail the Irish government

---

Interruptions undermine workplace focus and productivity

---

How long might commuters be waiting for the Dart to Drogheda?

---

From Nicola Coughlan’s hunks in landscaped gardens to Cillian Murphy’s gripping gangster romp: Patrick Freyne’s costume drama guide

---

Giving evidence on Tuesday, Mr McCarthy told Karl Finnegan SC, prosecuting, that he was involved in a €3.65 million loan application from Mr Lynn relating to the purchase of 11 residential investment properties in Dublin.

Mr McCarthy told the court he met Mr Lynn on one occasion in his office in Blanchardstown around September 2006. He said the meeting “sticks out in his mind” because they met for a considerable length of time and, at the end, he said Mr Lynn said “one final thing” before asking if his solicitor’s firm could provide the undertaking to the bank.

This was “a very unusual request”, Mr McCarthy said. He said he raised the request in the application to the bank and they “acquiesced on the basis that a different partner to (Michael Lynn) would provide the undertaking”.

Mr Finnegan brought Mr McCarthy through evidence Mr Lynn previously gave about him, including that around September or October 2007, after Mr Lynn had got into difficulties, he said he met Mr McCarthy who told him: “I’m not going to agree we allowed this flexible lending, so you’re on your own”.

“It was clear to me, I’d be left holding the baby,” the court heard Mr Lynn previously said.

In response, Mr McCarthy said he had a telephone call around this time with Mr Lynn after the bank asked him to follow up on getting the first legal charge registered. He said Mr Lynn told him this would be “actioned” and that he took this to mean “that the legal charge would be secured and registered”.

Mr McCarthy told the court: “I don’t know what he means about flexible lending.”

In relation to comments by Mr Lynn that there was a “dual approach” to lending, Mr McCarthy said he took that to mean that there was underhand or side arrangements with the bank. “Absolutely not,” he said in response to this suggestion

Under cross-examination from defence counsel, Paul Comiskey O’Keeffe BL, Mr McCarthy said he was not aware of any information being withheld by the bank from gardaí and was not aware of enquiries from the financial regulator in relation to the loans.

The court was shown documentation which referred to Mr Lynn’s plans to build circa 5,000 units around Europe with a sales value of €55 million. The witness said he had never seen the document before and prosecution counsel said it was dated eight months later.

Mr Comiskey O’Keeffe put it to Mr McCarthy that he and his bank were interested in the €55 million “that would come from your relationship with Michael Lynn”.

“Obviously potentially there would be opportunity from it, but that was not the focus of this application,” Mr McCarthy replied. He later added it was not the reason the bank gave Mr Lynn money for the 11 apartments.

Judge Martin Nolan intervened at one point to point out to Mr Comiskey O’Keeffe: “Your client told him all about that” and that Mr McCarthy was “not the developer”.

“He seems to be the quantity surveyor,” Mr Comiskey O’Keeffe replied.

The trial continues before Judge Martin Nolan and a jury.