Nurse sexually assaulted pensioner who couldn’t move because of amputated leg

Judge describes attack as ‘absolutely horrific’

Defence QC David Hopley told Downpatrick Crown Court that David Hull was “deeply ashamed and terribly sorry”.
Defence QC David Hopley told Downpatrick Crown Court that David Hull was “deeply ashamed and terribly sorry”.

A male nurse launched what a judge described as an “absolutely horrific” sex attack on an elderly and vulnerable patient, a court heard today.

Although defence QC David Hopley told Downpatrick Crown Court that 58-year-old David Hull was “deeply ashamed and terribly sorry” for what he had done, Judge Piers Grant said not only had Hull breached the trust placed in him but that his actions had “exacerbated” the woman’s medical conditions of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and panic attacks.

“An additional factor that flows from the position she was in [is that] she was completely and utterly at his mercy,” said the judge.

Hull, an auxiliary nurse from Main Street in Carrowdore, had pleaded guilty to two charges of sexual assault of his 65-year-old victim on September 2nd last year while the female pensioner was an inpatient at the Ulster Hospital.

READ MORE

Sitting in the dock with his head bowed throughout the half-hour hearing, grey-haired, balding and bespectacled Hull listened as prosecuting lawyer David McDowell outlined how his victim was vulnerable and bed-bound, suffered COPD and had been admitted to hospital when she developed a chest infection.

Added to that, the lawyer revealed the woman was unable to move around her bed very much because her lower leg had been amputated.

Mr McDowell recounted that at about 9.30pm on September 2nd, Hull was in the process of changing the woman’s sanitary pad and had cleaned her when he sexually assaulted her, touching both her genitals and anus.

At the time and with the curtains closed around the victim’s bed, Hull refused the offer of help made by a female nurse, the lawyer told the court, adding that the pensioner was “shocked and horrified” at the assault.

“As he did this he said nothing and then he put the clean pad on, pulled the sheet over her and left, leaving her in shock,” said Mr McDowell.

The woman did not report the incident until the following day and it was “reported up the line expeditiously and treated with the seriousness which it merited”, but the court heard how the pensioner was fearful that as Hull would have had access to her medical notes, he would come back to the hospital or find her address.

However, as Mr McDowell told the court, “obviously there was no question of that in the circumstances”.

Arrested and interviewed, Hull claimed the incident had happened accidentally when his hand slipped off the cleaning cloth but that when it did, “he found it sexually arousing”.

“He said he was disgusted at himself and that he would have to be punished, but he said that was for getting it wrong in not reporting it and not looking after the patient rather than for committing a sexual offence,” the lawyer told the court.

Mr Hopley conceded that married father-of-one Hull had “broke every code” when he assaulted the pensioner and that although he realised the harm he caused, it was “very hard for him to accept that he engaged in this behaviour”.

Remanding Hull back into custody, Judge Grant said he would sentence him this Friday.