Brussels attacks: More stringent passenger screening urged

‘If you don’t ramp up rail security, that’s going to drive terrorists to the rail network’

Catalan regional police patrol at Barcelona’s El Prat airport on Tuesday following the attacks in Brussels. There are calls for a rollout of full-scale security measures across Europe’s rail network and airports. Photograph: Pau Barrena/AFP/Getty Images

The bomb attacks in Brussels have reignited calls for a rollout of full-scale security measures across Europe’s rail network and airports to stop further terrorist outrages.

Armed police were yesterday deployed to airports, train stations and border crossings across Europe and the US.

From London to New York, security measures were stepped up at transport hubs, with police and the military carrying out extra checks. In the UK, the government said it had increased its border force presence at ports, with additional checks on some flights.

Forensic policemen arrive at the Maelbeek subway station, in Brussels, yesterday after a series of apparently coordinated explosions. Photograph: Philippe Guguen/AFP/Getty

But the twin explosions at the departure hall of Brussels’s Zaventem airport and another at the Maelbeek metro station are likely to accelerate calls for a permanent strengthening in security.

READ MORE

Rail network

“There has to be more security as you enter the airport, otherwise these type of attacks are going to increase,” said David Bentley, an airport analyst. “And if you don’t ramp up rail security to go with it, that’s just going to drive terrorists on to the railway network.”

In a statement yesterday, however, ACI Europe, which represents airports in 45 European countries, said security measures such as checks on people and goods entering airport landside spaces could be disruptive and create new vulnerabilities.

“By displacing the gathering of passengers and airport visitors to spaces not designed for that purpose, such measures would essentially be moving the target rather than securing it,” it said.

Last August, a thwarted attack on a high-speed train between Amsterdam and Paris laid bare the lack of security on Europe’s rail network. Moroccan-born Ayoub el-Khazzani was able to board at Brussels’s Midi station carrying a Kalashnikov assault rifle, 270 rounds of ammunition, a handgun and half a litre of petrol, before being disarmed by a group of American passengers.

While this resulted in European ministers backing tighter security measures on the region’s rail network, full-scale security checks – complete with barefooted passengers padding through metal detectors – have been rejected due to both the cost and inconvenience it would cause.

The challenge of policing Europe’s rail system is immense due to the huge amounts of people that travel on it every day. About 100 million people use London Waterloo train station annually, while French operator SNCF transports 10 million passengers each day.

Trial screening

The British government trialled airport-security screening at some rail stations in 2006 as part of a review of counterterrorism measures following the London bombings. Ministers ruled out a “closed” security system – checking all passengers – in part because of the huge numbers of commuters involved. While airports could consider introducing security checks to anyone who enters the terminal building – rather than the current system where people are screened when going into areas where the exit gates to the aircraft are located – some believe this would be the wrong approach.

"We shouldn't be introducing any more security checks, instead we should be changing our approach to security," said Philip Baum, editor of Aviation Security International magazine.

“We need to make security less predictable and focus on behavioural identifying measures, increasing the number of patrols by security personnel and canine units.”

– Copyright The Financial Times Ltd 2016