On January 28th two activists from Riposte Alimentaire (Food Counterattack) threw soup at the Mona Lisa at the Louvre in Paris.
Leonardo da Vinci’s masterpiece is safely behind glass and no real harm was done but the act made headlines around the world. So does shock coverage matter more than the message?
And are activists, particularly climate activists, about to get a great deal more radical in their protests as the crisis deepens and becomes ever more immediate?
Dana Fisher, director of the Center for Environment, Community, & Equity at American University in Washington and author of Saving Ourselves: From Climate Shocks to Climate Action explains why protesters behave the way they do and what turns an interested bystander into a radical activist.
US-Ukraine ties sour as leaders trade ‘dictator’ and ‘disinformation’ barbs
Analysis: Trump’s dash for a Ukraine deal is a godsend to Putin’s regime
Tens of thousands of health staff appointed since 2008 can have rosters changed, says HSE chief
John McManus: Would you be happy to see your neighbours build a second home in the garden?
Presented by Bernice Harrison. Produced by John Casey.
