Uber surges further ahead of rival Lyft in ride-share race

Lyft acknowledges profits will fall as it tries to catch up in increasingly lopsided battle

Lyft shares plunged 30 per cent in after-hours trading following Uber's results. Photograph: Lane Turner/Boston Globe via Getty Images
Lyft shares plunged 30 per cent in after-hours trading following Uber's results. Photograph: Lane Turner/Boston Globe via Getty Images

Uber is quickly cementing its rideshare dominance as rival Lyft acknowledged it would have to accept lower profits to keep from falling further behind.

Lyft shares plunged 30 per cent in after-hours trading following the results, which highlighted the growing gap between two long-time competitors that popularised ride-hailing apps and have fought one another for years over market share.

On Wednesday, Uber said that for the first time it surpassed two billion trips globally in a single quarter, an average of almost one million trips per hour. Gross bookings – the total value of fares paid – in the mobility unit grew 31 per cent year on year.

It has also benefited from its expansion beyond its core business into things such as food delivery, which exploded in popularity at the peak of the coronavirus pandemic and helped prop up the company while the rideshare business recovered from lockdowns.

READ MORE

“The pandemic’s impact on our mobility business is now well and truly behind us,” chief executive Dara Khosrowshahi told investors, saying he expected “growth and profitability” in the year ahead.

By contrast, Lyft’s first-quarter outlook on Thursday indicated it would need to eat into its own margins to match lower base fares on offer from Uber. Forecasts for profitability, on an adjusted basis, were placed at between $5 million (€4.7 million) and $15 million (€14 million) for the current quarter, well below Wall Street’s expectations for around $85 million (€79.2 million), according to S&P Capital IQ.

“This is obviously not the level of growth, profitability we are aiming for or capable of,” said Logan Green, co-founder and chief executive, speaking to investors on Thursday. “And we are laser-focused on driving additional growth and managing costs.” A reduction in base fares was necessary to defend market share and “remain competitive”, Green said. Seeking positives, Green drew attention to the final quarter of 2022, in which the company beat analyst expectations

“We had 20.4 million active riders, which was the highest level in nearly 3 years, and revenue per active rider reached a new record,” he said.

But that performance has been heavily overshadowed by an uncertain future for the company that went public in March 2019 at a value of $24 billion (€22.4 billion), but was worth $5.9 billion (€5.5 billion) as of Thursday’s close, before it was battered in after-hours trading.

Uber is also trading well below its stock market debut price, 14 per cent lower than at the time of its debut two months after Lyft. Lyft’s struggles are the most significant signal yet that a bitter rivalry, one that once defined the aggressive Silicon Valley start-up culture, has now become heavily one-sided. Lyft’s smaller geographic spread has made its post-lockdown emergence far slower.

Its strongest market, the US west coast, is still far from a full recovery, noted Truist analyst Youssef Squali.

“Lyft’s California rides business is only back to 60 per cent of 2019 levels, whereas Uber, in aggregate, is almost back to pre-Covid levels. That’s a huge difference,” Squali said. These geographical limitations, plus a lack of a delivery business and other failed diversification efforts, has Lyft looking vulnerable, Squali added.

Its bikes and scooter businesses are also less popular due to cold and wet weather. But that drag is only expected to account for one-third of the headwinds in the quarter, the company said.

The real strain will come from the need to lower fares. And, having provided large incentive payments to lure more drivers back to the roads after the peak of the pandemic, greater supply means there are fewer opportunities to implement the higher-price “surge” pricing.

“It’s a hard position for them at a time when their biggest competitor is shining through, with a model that has proven superior,” Squali said. – The Financial Times 2023