Losing SEAI retrofit services bidder challenges refusal to disclose pricing structure of winning bid

Company supplying service for past 13 years says winning tender is pitched at 30% below current rate

Bidder who lost out on a €75 million retrofitting survey contract wants the pricing structure of the winning bid disclosed. Photograph: Chris Maddaloni/Collins
Bidder who lost out on a €75 million retrofitting survey contract wants the pricing structure of the winning bid disclosed. Photograph: Chris Maddaloni/Collins

A losing bidder for a €75 million contract with a Government body is appealing a High Court refusal to order the winning bidder to disclose its lower pricing structure.

The contract, awarded by the Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland (SEAI), is to provide surveys for the retrofitting of hundreds of thousands of properties. It will last up to five years and is estimated to be worth €75 million.

The services provided under the contract will also include supplying building energy ratings (BERs) and inspections.

The contract is currently held by Kerrigan Sheanon Newman Unlimited Company, which has been supplying the services to the SEAI since 2012.

READ MORE

The company lost out in the public procurement process when a new contract was publicly offered for tender. That tender was won by Abtran.

Kerrigan Sheanon Newman then brought High Court proceedings against the SEAI, with Abtran as notice party, challenging the award. It claimed the Abtran tender was too low, pointing out that it was 30 per cent lower than the price currently being paid to it for the service.

The SEAI disputes Kerrigan Sheanon Newman’s claims.

In a pretrial application, Kerrigan Sheanon Newman sought discovery of documents and materials from the SEAI in relation to the Abtran tender.

Last February, the High Court refused to grant discovery, saying Kerrigan Sheanon Newman did not provide compelling arguments to justify the “very significant encroachment on the confidentiality of a winning tenderer’s bid”.

On Tuesday, Jonathan Newman SC, for Kerrigan Sheanon Newman, told the court his client has brought an appeal over that decision. While there had been certain agreed discovery between the parties, the High Court decision went against “the run of case law” in discovery.

An appeal date had been set in July and the parties were agreeable to a hearing of the matter in December, he said.

Mr Justice Mark Sanfey said it was clearly a very urgent matter and he would list it for hearing for four days in December.

  • Join The Irish Times on WhatsApp and stay up to date

  • Sign up to the Business Today newsletter for the latest new and commentary in your inbox

  • Listen to Inside Business podcast for a look at business and economics from an Irish perspective