The widow of Belfast solicitor Pat Finucane is to seek damages against the UK government for remaining in breach of a legal obligation to carry out an investigation into his murder, Northern Ireland’s High Court heard today.
A judge was also told that Northern Ireland Secretary Chris Heaton-Harris will provide a time frame next week for taking a new decision on whether to order a public inquiry.
The developments came in a challenge by the lawyer’s family to an ongoing failure to establish such an investigation.
Mr Finucane (39) was shot dead by loyalist paramilitary gunmen in front of his wife Geraldine and three children at their north Belfast home in February 1989.
‘No place to hide’: Trapped on the US-Mexico border, immigrants fear deportation
Mark O'Connell: The mystery is not why we Irish have responded to Israel’s barbarism. It’s why others have not
TV guide: the best new shows to watch, starting tonight
Face it: if you’re the designated cook, there is no 15-minute Christmas
His family have campaigned ever since for a public inquiry to establish the full scale of security force collusion in one of the most notorious assassinations during the Troubles.
In 2019, the UK supreme court declared that previous investigations into the killing failed to meet standards required by article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Since then, Ms Finucane has mounted further legal battles against the UK government’s response to that finding.
In November 2020, former secretary of state Brandon Lewis announced there would not be a public inquiry at this stage because he wanted other police review processes to run their course.
He was ordered then to pay £7,500 damages to Ms Finucane for the excessive delay in reaching that position.
The current challenge centred on the legality of that decision to await the outcome of reviews by the PSNI’s Legacy Investigations Branch and the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland.
Last month, a High Court judge ruled that the UK government remains in breach of article 2 by the ongoing delay in completing an inquiry that meets those legal requirements.
Mr Justice Scoffield quashed the decision not to establish a public inquiry at this stage, and held that Mr Lewis unlawfully failed to reconsider that position following the conclusion of a police review process.
He directed that a fresh decision must now be taken on how to address the continued investigative deficiencies within a set time frame.
The judge said Ms Finucane found herself “in a sorry situation” nearly four years after the Supreme Court’s declaration.
Ordering the current Secretary of State to reconsider the government’s response to those findings, he set out the need for a fresh decision on holding a public inquiry with full reasons provided.
At a further hearing on Friday, Ms Finucane’s barrister confirmed she will be seeking costs for her legal action.
Fiona Doherty added: “It is our submission that the applicant is entitled to damages.”
Counsel for Mr Heaton-Harris, Paul McLaughlin, said a final position has not yet been reached on the proposed timescale for a decision.
“Part of any decision of this nature which may involve a public inquiry involves consultation with the prime minister and across government,” Mr McLaughlin said.
“It is expected that we will have that early next week.”