Courts

High Court orders son to repay €192,000 to mother’s €6m estate

Dermot Horan took advantage of his mother’s inability to manage affairs, judge says

The judge found that Dermot Horan exerted undue influence over his mother
Fri Jul 12 2024 - 18:04

The High Court has ordered the son of a woman who left a €6 million estate to repay €192,000 after a judge said he had taken advantage of his mother’s inability to manage her affairs in a series of “disturbing and indefensible” actions.

Dermot Horan, after getting control of the finances of his late mother Mary Ann (also known as Maureen) Horan, withdrew €700 in cash every day from ATMs over a 12-month period for his own benefit, Mr Justice Brian Cregan said.

“His use of that money for his own ends all show a devious attempt to take advantage of his elderly and infirm mother for his own financial ends,” he said.

The judge ordered him to repay the €192,000 he removed after finding Mr Horan exerted undue influence over his mother who had lived in Ramor Park, Blanchardstown, Dublin, and died in April 2018.

READ MORE

The orders were made following an application by a court-appointed administrator of Mrs Horan’s estate seeking declarations that Mr Horan unlawfully set up a joint account with his mother when she was suffering from dementia and unlawfully withdrew the money.

The judge said Mrs Horan, in a 2006 will, left her estate of some €6 million to her four children, Dermot, Josephine, Stephen and Yvonne. The principal asset was a substantial industrial property at Fonthill Industrial Park, Clondalkin, Dublin, from which she received a gross annual rental income of some €264,000.

She left the family home in Ramor Park to Dermot as well as the entire shareholding, worth around half a million, of the family company, Westwood International Transport Ltd, which had been set up by her late husband but later virtually ceased trading. In all Dermot was left some €1 million from the estate along with 25 per cent of the remaining assets.

The court appointed a solicitor as administrator after Josephine, Stephen and Yvonne sought Dermot’s removal as executor on misconduct grounds.

There had been a “history of considerable acrimony” between Dermot and his siblings, Mr Justice Cregan said.

The judge had “no doubt that the blame lies entirely with Mr Dermot Horan”, through conduct which began to manifest around September 2014 when his mother was admitted to hospital complaining of abdominal and back pain.

Dermot disagreed she should be in hospital but she remained there for 329 days until Dermot discharged her against medical advice in July 2015.

Despite repeated requests from the hospital to return with her and despite suggestions from his siblings that she get 24-hour care at home, Dermot refused, the judge said.

However, after a fall Mrs Horan was readmitted to hospital in September 2015. In the meantime, the siblings became so concerned at the way Dermot was looking after their mother that they applied and were granted an order that she be made a ward of court.

Four different doctors gave evidence in the wardship proceedings that Mrs Horan was suffering from dementia.

While a social worker and public health nurse found no evidence of any immediate risk to Mrs Horan and that she presented as being well cared for (by Dermot), the condition of the house “left something to be desired and the kitchen appeared to be in an unhygienic state”, the judge said.

Dermot Horan contested each and every one of the medical reports and sought to argue that there was nothing wrong with his mother.

Mr Justice Cregan made an order also removing Dermot as a trustee.

The judge was satisfied Dermot was not a credible or reliable witness.

He was satisfied that the redirecting of his mother’s rental income from a joint account he set up and in withdrawing all the money in it were unconscionable.