Grim anti-abortion session with the agency that `only wants what's best'

My appointment at the Aadam's Women's Centre in Dublin was easily made

My appointment at the Aadam's Women's Centre in Dublin was easily made. Calling them in May 1998 with a story that I thought I was pregnant, I was invited to an apartment block in North Great George's Street any day that suited me.

The woman on the phone gave me a number to key into the intercom board at the front door.

When I arrived a middle-aged woman ushered me upstairs to the apartment where a younger woman sat behind a desk in a small room.

Having taken the usual medical details, the younger woman went on to ask me how I felt about the "pregnancy".

READ MORE

"Well," I replied, "it's a disaster really. I just can't have a baby at this point. I want to terminate the pregnancy. That's what I want to discuss with you."

At this point I was invited to watch a video on the "medical facts about abortion". I was left alone.

The film opened with a young American woman standing behind a table of various steel instruments.

She said first there would be "no political lecturing in this educational presentation on the truth about abortion."

A low-key description of the suction method of termination progressed to a graphic outline, with descriptive use of the instruments by the doctor, of the action of cuterage (scraping the foetus from the womb).

This was followed by cartoon-like images of a hysterectomy and finally imagery of a foetus being dismembered for tissue research.

The middle aged woman then returned, with the question: "Well, what did you think of that?"

I told her I hoped I would not have to have an abortion so late in a pregnancy. She asked what being pregnant meant to me.

"Expecting a baby," I said.

"Exactly," she nodded before asking why I felt I could not have one.

When I said I felt I couldn't cope, she pressed "play" on the video again.

Several American women, in silhouette, spoke about having an abortion. One said she felt she had "murdered" her baby. Another said: "It's five years now and I still live with the remorse every day."

Then there was an ultra-sound image of an eight-week foetus in the womb.

"That's your baby. That's the stage your baby is at now," commented the middle-aged woman.

Taken aback I commented that I was carrying a six-week foetus - not a baby. I was then handed a two-inch plastic model of a baby.

"That's the size of your baby now. Go on, hold it there."

The younger woman had rejoined us by this stage. She said they wanted only what was best for me. I agreed that I too wanted what was best for me.

She moved on to the "terrible risks involved in an abortion" saying I could develop breast cancer, bowel problems, infertility and psychological problems.

They asked whether I thought abortion was "morally right". I asked whether they could give me numbers in Britain to make an appointment for an abortion myself.

They said I should think about it and read some information first.

I was given a bag of photocopied letters from mothers of "saved babies", an article headed "Victim Of An Abortion Profiteer", and a leaflet with pictures of live and aborted foetuses.

They wanted me do the right thing, they said, and asked me to return the following week.