Turmoil at University of Limerick over a costly student housing project has amplified concerns about the institution’s internal controls.
In January, UL said it should take a €3 million charge in its 2022-2023 accounts for overspending five years ago when it bought a former Dunnes Stores site in Limerick. That was bad enough, but only the beginning.
Now the university has admitted a €5.2 million overpayment when buying 20 student houses in 2022.
The total burden therefore exceeds €8 million, a huge sum that points to feeble financial oversight. But the reputational damage is greater still. Senior academics want UL president Prof Kerstin Mey to step aside and State supervisors are questioning whether the university can be trusted to manage its affairs.
Parents’ group criticises closure of hundreds of schools to facilitate general election
Students deserve a reformed Leaving Cert that prepares them for the modern world
Explainer: why are second level teachers protesting outside schools today?
Students ‘cannot afford to wait’ for Leaving Cert reform - Norma Foley
Prof Mey has lost the confidence of the influential executive committee that advises her: 10 of its 13 members have said they want her to consider her position because they doubt she will tackle the housing fallout “in an appropriate manner”. She has made no public comment, although a meeting on Thursday of the UL governing authority will be significant for the immediate future of the university.
All of this has raised sharp questions within the Coalition and the Higher Education Authority, the public body that supervises universities and their money. The HEA can intervene in UL, although its position is unlikely to be determined until the governing authority settles its response on Thursday.
[ University of Limerick faces threat to funding after botched housing projectOpens in new window ]
The HEA Act of 2022 empowers the authority to impose “remedial or other measures” on a university where the HEA chief executive considers there are “serious deficiencies” in compliance with funding conditions. Such measures can include temporary exclusion from some or all categories of HEA funding and “revised” funding conditions or the “controlled release” of funding. Other measures include the appointment “of a person or persons, or of a body, to provide advice or assistance of a specialist nature” or “an admonishment or censure in writing”.
Questions abound. After UL overspent badly on the Dunnes site in 2019 and again three years later for student housing, it seems obvious to ask whether there were any further examples of wasteful spending. Even if there is nothing else, how exactly did UL make an error so grave in the housing deal after it was burned so badly on the Dunnes property?
UL is competing with three other universities for money for a new veterinary school. These ructions will not strengthen its case.
- Listen to our Inside Politics Podcast for the latest analysis and chat
- Sign up for push alerts and have the best news, analysis and comment delivered directly to your phone
- Find The Irish Times on WhatsApp and stay up to date
