Paul Hyde, deputy chairman of An Bord Pleanála, has resigned from his position, the Department of Housing has confirmed.
Mr Hyde, the second highest official in the planning appeals authority, tendered his resignation to Minister for Housing Darragh O’Brien on Friday in advance of a number of inquiries into allegations of conflict of interest, a spokesperson for the Department of Housing confirmed to The Irish Times.
The investigation centres on claims that Mr Hyde was conflicted in some planning decisions as well as his personal property investments, his debts and his statutory declarations to the planning appeals body.
In May, Mr O’Brien appointed senior counsel Remy Farrell to investigate the allegations. The six-week investigation was due to conclude at the end of June but was extended by another five weeks.
Leaving Cert 2.0: What to expect from the reformed senior cycle
A Dunnes parcel goes missing, a customer loses €672, and the retailer won’t repay her
Housing crisis unlikely to improve in short term under ‘conservative’ targets
Ciarán Cuffe: While LA burns, Fianna Fáil says pro-climate policies are ‘open for discussion’
Mr Hyde denied any impropriety but stood aside temporarily “without prejudice” from his role pending Mr Farrell’s report. An internal review of cases over which Mr Hyde presided is also being conducted by the planning board.
[ Investigation at An Bord Pleanála unaffected by resignation, says departmentOpens in new window ]
Mr Hyde was appointed to the board in 2014, having previously served as a member of the Marine Institute.
He was promoted to deputy chair of the board and appointed chair of the Strategic Housing Development (SHD) subcommittee in 2019.
Mr Farrell was to review three specific planning decisions, including a case where ABP refused permission in March for a fast-track apartment scheme in Blackpool, Cork, on a site near property owned by a company in which Mr Hyde had a quarter share.
Mr Hyde’s stake in the company — controlled by his father Stephen Hyde — was never set out in his declarations of interest to ABP but he insisted it there was no need to because the company was dormant and not in effect carrying on any trade even though it owned property near the site of a proposed development.
