Appeal seeks to halt pigfeed dioxin case

A BUSINESSMAN being sued over the pigfeed dioxin contamination scandal is appealing against the High Court’s refusal to halt …

A BUSINESSMAN being sued over the pigfeed dioxin contamination scandal is appealing against the High Court’s refusal to halt the case against him and his company.

At the Commercial Court yesterday, Mr Justice Peter Kelly granted Gerard Tierney a temporary stay on the High Court’s refusal to dismiss the case brought by Millstream Recycling Ltd, Clonmahon, Bunclody, Co Wexford, against Mr Tierney and his company, Newtown Lodge, Fairview, Dublin.

The temporary stay applies until May 18th when the judge will assess whether to continue it after being informed of the progress of efforts to secure an early hearing of Mr Tierney’s appeal.

Because appeals to the Supreme Court can in some cases take up to three years, lawyers for Millstream had expressed concern about the impact of a long stay on their proceedings.

READ MORE

Last March, Mr Tierney (75), Newtown Park Avenue, Blackrock, Dublin, lost his High Court appeal to stop the case, in which it is claimed he and Newtown Lodge supplied defective oil which contaminated pig feed with dioxins and led to the recall of all Irish pork products in 2008 at a cost of more than €180 million.

Mr Tierney and Newtown had claimed Millstream had no prospect of success in its action against them. It was denied the oil supplied to Millstream was defective. If the oil was contaminated, Mr Tierney/Newtown claimed that was not their fault as, they alleged, it had been supplied to them by another company, O’Neill Fuels Ltd, Annaghmore Hill, Coalisland, Co Tyrone.

Dismissing the Tierney/Newtown application last month, Mr Justice Peter Charleton ruled the case by Millstream should proceed against both Mr Tierney and his company.

He also refused an application by Tierney/Newtown to order Millstream to provide security for the defendants’ costs of the action. He noted Milstream was facing a number of court claims totalling nearly €32 million.

Millstream had argued any inability to pay those costs was as a result of the defendants’ alleged wrongdoing.

Yesterday, Mr Justice Kelly said he was satisfied to grant a stay until May 18th, when the court was to be informed of progress in seeking an early appeal to the Supreme Court.