Receivers told to vacate Dublin’s Harbourmaster Bar

Loans linked to pub taken over by Nama and then sold on to US hedge fund Cerberus

Receivers must vacate Dublin’s Harbourmaster Bar which they took over earlier this week so it can continue to trade during this weekend’s Ireland-Italy rugby international, the High Court has ruled.
Receivers must vacate Dublin’s Harbourmaster Bar which they took over earlier this week so it can continue to trade during this weekend’s Ireland-Italy rugby international, the High Court has ruled.

Receivers must vacate Dublin’s Harbourmaster Bar which they took over earlier this week so it can continue to trade during this weekend’s Ireland-Italy rugby international, the High Court has ruled.

Mr Justice Paul Gilligan granted an injunction requiring receivers Jim Hamilton and David O’Connor leave the Harbourmaster property until the case returns to court next week.

The judge said he was satisfied to grant the order because the dispute was over a single issue relating to the amount of rent payable by the pub operators.

He noted the takeover by the receivers occurred just before an international rugby weekend which would be “very viable” for the business.

READ MORE

The pub operators, SD Entertainments Ltd,  claim the receivers are not entitled to forfeit the lease. The bar employs 45 people.

SD’s main shareholder, Sean Doyle, who is also involved in a number of other pubs, claimed the receivers had without notice drilled through the locks of the pub on Thursday to gain access to the premises and were also armed with the alarm codes.

Applying for the injunction on a one-side only represented basis, David Kennedy SC, for SD, said his client had paid the previous landlord an agreed reduced rent.

The landlord’s loans for the pub were taken over by Nama which later sold them on to US hedge fund Cerberus last January, counsel said. They appointed receivers who forcibly entered early on Thursday morning.

Mr Doyle has a 19 year lease on the premises, with an option to buy first should it be put up for sale.  He had also put €400,000 worth of fittings into it, counsel said.

Counsel said the reduced rent had been paid up to the last two or three payments. Those latter were not paid only as a result of an issue over the new landlord requiring VAT invoices to be furnished. His client had an explanation in that regard.

Mr Doyle was prepared to continue paying that rent, the court heard. It would be possible to have the premises re-opened immediately so it can meet its schedule commitments for this weekend including a 50th birthday party, counsel said.

Mr Justice Gilligan said he was satisfied to grant the temporary injunction requiring the property be vacated by the receivers until the case returns next week.