Number of birds in North America declines by 3 billion

‘People need to pay attention to the birds around them, they are slowly disappearing’

A Baltimore oriole. Photograph: Gary Mueller, Macaulay Library at Cornell Lab of Ornithology via The New York Times
A Baltimore oriole. Photograph: Gary Mueller, Macaulay Library at Cornell Lab of Ornithology via The New York Times

North America’s skies are lonelier and quieter as nearly three billion fewer wild birds soar in the air than in 1970, a comprehensive study shows.

The new study focuses on the drop in sheer numbers of birds, not extinctions.

The bird population in the United States and Canada was probably around 10.1 billion nearly half a century ago — and has fallen 29 per cent to about 7.2 billion birds, according to a study in the journal Science.

“People need to pay attention to the birds around them because they are slowly disappearing,” said study lead author Kenneth Rosenberg, a Cornell University conservation scientist.

READ MORE

“One of the scary things about the results is that it is happening right under our eyes. We might not even notice it until it’s too late.”

A wood thrush. The number of birds in the United States and Canada has fallen by 29 per cent since 1970. Photograph: Michael Parr, American Bird Conservancy via The New York Times
A wood thrush. The number of birds in the United States and Canada has fallen by 29 per cent since 1970. Photograph: Michael Parr, American Bird Conservancy via The New York Times

Mr Rosenberg and colleagues projected population data using weather radar, 13 different bird surveys going back to 1970 and computer modelling to come up with trends for 529 species of North American birds.

That is not all species, but more than three-quarters of them and most of the missed species are quite rare, Mr Rosenberg said.

Using weather radar data, which captures flocks of migrating birds, is a new method, he said.

“This is a landmark paper. It’s put numbers to everyone’s fears about what’s going on,” said Joel Cracraft, curator-in-charge for ornithology of the American Museum of Natural History, who was not part of the study.

A capped Chickadee in New York’s Central Park. Photograph: Demetrius Freeman/The New York Times
A capped Chickadee in New York’s Central Park. Photograph: Demetrius Freeman/The New York Times

“It’s even more stark than what many of us might have guessed,” Mr Cracraft said.

Every year University of Connecticut’s Margaret Rubega, the state ornithologist, gets calls from people noticing fewer birds. And this study, which she was not part of, highlights an important problem, she said.

“If you came out of your house one morning and noticed that a third of all the houses in your neighbourhood were empty, you’d rightly conclude that something threatening was going on,” Ms Rubega said in an email.

“Three billion of our neighbours, the ones who eat the bugs that destroy our food plants and carry diseases like equine encephalitis, are gone. I think we all ought to think that’s threatening.”

Some of the most common and recognisable birds are taking the biggest hits, even though they are not near disappearing yet, Mr Rosenberg said.

A cactus wren. Photograph: Brian Sullivan, Macaulay Library at Cornell Lab of Ornithology via The New York Times
A cactus wren. Photograph: Brian Sullivan, Macaulay Library at Cornell Lab of Ornithology via The New York Times

The common house sparrow was at the top of the list for losses, as were many other sparrows.

The population of eastern meadowlarks has shrivelled by more than three-quarters with the western meadowlark nearly as hard hit.

Bobwhite quail numbers are down 80 per cent, Mr Rosenberg said.

Grassland birds in general are less than half what they used to be, he said.

Not all bird populations are shrinking. For example, bluebirds are increasing, mostly because people have worked hard to get their numbers up. – PA