Expanded powers to monitor UK email planned

LONDON – British ministers are preparing a major expansion of the government’s powers to monitor the email exchanges and website…

LONDON – British ministers are preparing a major expansion of the government’s powers to monitor the email exchanges and website visits of every person in the UK, it was reported yesterday.

Under legislation expected in next month’s queen’s speech, internet firms will be instructed to install hardware enabling GCHQ – the government’s electronic “listening” agency – to examine “on demand” any phone call made, text message and email sent, and website accessed in “real time”, the Sunday Times reported.

An attempt to bring in a similar law was abandoned by the former Labour government in 2006 in the face of fierce opposition.

Ministers say the police and security services must have access to such communications data in order to tackle terrorism and protect the public.

READ MORE

Although GCHQ would not be able to access the content of such communications without a warrant, the legislation would enable it to trace people who individuals or groups are in contact with, and how often and for how long they are in communication.

The UK home office confirmed that ministers were intending to legislate “as soon as parliamentary time allows”.

“It is vital that police and security services are able to obtain communications data in certain circumstances to investigate serious crime and terrorism and to protect the public,” a spokesman said.

The data sought includes “time, duration and dialling numbers of a phone call, or an email address. It does not include the content of any phone call or email, and it is not the intention of government to make changes to the existing legal basis for the interception of communications,” he said.

Nick Pickles, director of the Big Brother Watch group, said: “This is an unprecedented step that will see Britain adopt the same kind of surveillance seen in China and Iran. This is an absolute attack on privacy online, and it is far from clear this will actually improve public safety, while adding significant costs to internet businesses.

“If this was such a serious security issue, why has the home office not ensured these powers were in place before the Olympics?” – (PA)