Numbers are up, but America's wolves are still not quite out of the woods

US: America's wolves have climbed back from the edge of extinction in the past 10 years to the point where the federal government…

US: America's wolves have climbed back from the edge of extinction in the past 10 years to the point where the federal government is about to relinquish responsibility for their protection. But environmentalists say the wolf is not quite out of the woods and warn that the human backlash against the predator has only just begun.

About 5,000 wolves - mainly Canadian greys - now roam the woods of Minnesota and the American west, compared with a population of barely 200 in the mid-1990s, before the animals were reintroduced to Yellowstone National Park.

The success of that programme has led to the relaxation of some of the animal's protections. The interior department is working on a plan to take it off the threatened species list and, from early January, the wolf packs of Idaho and Montana will no longer be wards of Washington.

Instead, they will have to rely on the state authorities to keep their enemies at bay. Those enemies are almost all human.

READ MORE

The success of the reintroduction has led to an outcry among western ranchers that the wolf packs represent a threat to their sheep and cattle.

Despite official statistics showing the wolves are responsible for a tiny proportion of livestock deaths, and the fact that ranchers are compensated for any such attacks, hunters in the western states are increasingly taking the law into their own hands.

This can involve shooting wolves or even venturing into the woods to drop poison meatballs.

Environmentalists question whether western states, which represent their overwhelmingly anti-wolf electorates, will have the political willpower to enforce the wolf's legal protections.

Ranchers can get licences to hunt wolves if they can prove they are killing livestock. From January, they will be able to get them from state authorities rather than having to apply to Washington.

"This is a bad idea," said Rodger Schlickeisen of the Defenders of Wildlife organisation. "Not least because several key state governments seem caught up in the reflexive hatred of some of the most strident of anti-wolf voices.

"State government antipathy and illegal killings mean that it's especially important to finish the job of wolf restoration, instead of stopping halfway, as the department of the interior intends."

Wyoming, where anti-wolf sentiment runs highest, wants to institute a shoot-on-sight policy outside its northwestern woodlands. The state governor, Dave Freudenthal, declared in April that the Endangered Species Act was no longer in force there and the state "now considers the wolf as a feral dog", unworthy of protection.

An Idaho man, Tim Sundles, is due in court in the next few weeks for poisoning wolves on federal land in a trial likely to bring emotions to a head.

He portrays his trial as a struggle between the individual and an "out-of-control federal agency", the US Fish and Wildlife Service.

Wolves are believed to have killed a man in Saskatchewan, Canada, in November. If confirmed, it would be the first lethal wolf attack in more than a century.