TD deplores 'hypocrisy' of landfill plan for bog

A Fine Gael frontbencher has opposed a proposed landfill site in the Bog of Allen. Michael O'Regan reports.

A Fine Gael frontbencher has opposed a proposed landfill site in the Bog of Allen. Michael O'Regan reports.

Mr Bernard Durkan, party spokesman on communications and natural resources, said the proposal had been approved by the Department of the Environment and supported by Kildare County Council.

"What is the wisdom behind locating a landfill site in the Bog of Allen, with the potential to pollute a large area as far as the River Shannon and north Munster?" he asked.

"People wishing to build houses in the same area are regularly refused planning permission on the grounds of pollution risks in this high water table area."

READ MORE

An excuse often given, said Mr Durkan, was that an extra septic tank or water treatment system would contribute to pollution.

"It is hypocritical of the Department, the local authority and experts to suggest that a massive landfill with a lifespan of 15 years will be less of a pollution threat than four dozen houses."

Mr Durkan, who represents Kildare North, said it would be argued that everyone opposed proposals in their backyard, the "NIMBY" factor.

"I admit the proposed site is in my backyard. However, I oppose it because Co Kildare has already catered for one landfill at Kill ... I do not wish my constituency to become the location for every landfill requirement in the State. Every other constituency has its responsibilities."

Mr Paul Gogarty (Green Party, Dublin Mid West) said that while the Bill was welcome, his party would oppose it.

"Although it is designed to modernise and manage water supply and distribution systems, it does not emphasise any aspect of conservation or sustainability, or, most importantly, water quality," he said.

Mr Paddy McHugh (Independent, Galway East) said it was unfortunate that some water group schemes were, for various reasons, not very well run. This was because in many cases the original trustees had become tired, and no longer able to carry on for health or other reasons.

"Responsibility for running such schemes is not being passed on.

"Trustees take on a lifelong commitment, and the issue warrants attention. I hope the Minister will establish a regime to resolve those questions."

The Minister for the Environment, Mr Roche, said the Water Services Bill was aimed at bringing the water services, which were put in place in the 19th century, into the 21st century. He stressed that the Bill did not provide for the reintroduction of domestic water charges.