UN nuclear head urges patience on Iran

The head of the United Nations' nuclear watchdog body has rebuffed Western critics of a cooperation deal it has struck with Iran…

The head of the United Nations' nuclear watchdog body has rebuffed Western critics of a cooperation deal it has struck with Iran as "back-seat drivers" and urged them to give it time to work to help avoid war.

Under the August 21st deal, the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency and Tehran agreed on a rough timetable for addressing lingering questions about Iran's nuclear activities.

IAEA director Mohamed ElBaradei said his agency would scrutinise Iran's pledge to cooperate by the end of the year and demand documents and other proof of good faith. If Iran reneged, it would jeopardise any grounds for future trust, he said.

He said critics had misread the pact in suggesting it ruled out future IAEA inquiries if new suspicions about Iranian activity arose, and lifted pressure on Iran to grant wider inspections or heed UN resolutions demanding it stop uranium enrichment, a process that can be used to make atom bombs.

READ MORE

"There have been back-seat drivers putting in their five cents saying this is not a good working arrangement," he told reporters invited into his Vienna office for a briefing.

"Iran can never get a pass (on their nuclear behaviour) until we decide to give them a pass. They may say (in public statements) that their file is now closed, but that is up to us.

"My advice is to bear with us until we go through this process ... We have a timeline which will enable us by November- December to check clearly whether Iran is ready to work with us in good faith, or whether, as some like to say, Iran is just buying time ... which would absolutely backfire (for them)."

Iran says it wants to enrich uranium only to generate electricity, not make atom bombs as the West suspects. UN inspectors remain unable to certify Iran has no secret military nuclear facility, but have found no proof of one.

"We don't see based on evidence we have that (Iran poses) a clear and present danger requiring you to go beyond diplomacy," he said, alluding to military action mooted by US hardliners. "I see war drums (being beaten) by those basically saying the short solution is to bomb Iran, which makes me shudder because the rhetoric reminds me of pre-Iraq war," he said.

A US State Department spokesman voiced irritation with ElBaradei's remarks, saying that if they were directed at Washington "they certainly would not be true".

"I would certainly hope that everyone - Dr ElBaradei included - would focus on what the real issues are here," said Tom Casey, alluding to UN demands for an enrichment halt.