Sunday’s election in Turkey, which could usher in a decisive change of direction in the country’s politics, pits challenger Kemal , Kılıçdaroğlu against incumbent president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, in office since 2014.
Erdogan’s Justice and Development party (AKP), the country’s dominant force for more than 20 years, practises a politics that is often described as “national-conservative”. It has also been called Islamist, a label the party rejects. President Erdoğan certainly finds his most loyal support among traditionalist and deeply religious elements of the electorate, particularly in rural areas, while the opposition’s strengths lie in cities and coastal regions living off tourism.
The coalition backing , Kılıçdaroğlu brings together six parties, with often quite disparate views on how to solve Turkey’s problems. His own grouping, the Republican People’s Party (CHP), is the second largest in parliament, with an ideology based on social democracy, mild social liberalism, Europeanism and ‘Kemalism’, the modernising secularist philosophy of the founder of the Turkish republic, Kemal Atatürk.
After a hard-fought referendum campaign, Turkey narrowly voted in 2017 to move from a parliamentary to a presidential system, abolishing the office of prime minister. While the AKP again looks likely to dominate parliament, most opinion polls have shown , Kılıçdaroğlu a few points ahead in the presidential race, some predicting a first-round win, others a narrow victory after a second round on May 28th.
Matt Williams: Take a deep breath and see how Sam Prendergast copes with big Fiji test
New Irish citizens: ‘I hear the racist and xenophobic slurs on the streets. Everything is blamed on immigrants’
Jack Reynor: ‘We were in two minds between eloping or going the whole hog but we got married in Wicklow with about 220 people’
‘I could have gone to California. At this rate, I probably would have raised about half a billion dollars’
The AKP has historic achievements to its credit in growing the Turkish economy. But its recent record, and that of Erdoğan, is more problematic, with political repression, galloping inflation, a currency collapse and a slow response to February’s catastrophic earthquake. A victory for Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu would be generally welcomed in Europe. There is, however, the danger of civil unrest if the AKP refuses to accept the result. An opposition victory could also put Turkish accession to the EU back on the agenda, a development which would not be welcomed by all current members.