A chara, – David O’Sullivan, the director general of the Institute of International and European Affairs, asks “How can we best protect Ireland’s security and prosperity into the future?” (“Ireland will need to develop a new vocabulary to talk about national security”, Opinion & Analysis, June 30th).
By way of an answer, he advocates “a holistic concept of security that embraces the full range of our political and economic interests, as well as our values”.
It seems apparent that, during his stint as EU ambassador to the US, Mr O’Sullivan fully imbibed what the political analyst Perry Anderson terms the American “catechism of security”: alarmist scenarios of vulnerability to external attack, the magnification of foreign dangers and the absurd notion that “our values” are intrinsic to security.
Mr O’Sullivan suggests that, “We will even need to develop a new vocabulary to talk about security”. However, his own lexicon is already well known to anyone familiar with what Anderson calls the “distortions of ideology and exaggerations of insecurity” that have underpinned US foreign policy for more than a century.
Joe Biden may be best to let sleeping dogs lie as new books lifts lid on his final days in office
An Irishman in Israel: Is it better for my Israeli daughters to grow up in Tel Aviv or Dublin?
Mark O’Connell: I recommend the funny, sad video of Ashton Hall’s morning ritual. Start time: 3.52am
‘I’m not an easy man to please’: How Christy Ring and Louis Marcus came together to shoot a landmark film
One hopes that the “national conversation” about defence that Mr O’Sullivan seeks to “nurture” will find its own voice. – Is mise,
DOMINIC CARROLL,
Ardfield,
Co Cork.
