Sir, – The debate around the concrete levy rumbles on with little or no reference to the wider issue of sustainable building materials, embodied carbon and carbon emissions.
If cement, which is the main ingredient in concrete, were a country, it would be the third-largest emitter of CO2 on Earth, not far behind global agriculture.
All concrete, however, is not equal. Up to 70 per cent of cement in concrete can be replaced by GGBS (ground granulated blast-furnace slag), reducing its embodied carbon significantly. Surely the use of products with high levels of cement replacement should be incentivised.
Ultimately though, a fundamental shift is needed away from non-renewable materials such as concrete towards wide-scale use of renewable, carbon-storing materials like timber. Government intervention is needed urgently on this front and perhaps the concrete levy is one part of this change. – Is mise,
Jennifer Johnston obituary: Writer who combined brevity with razor-sharp wisdom
Róisín Ingle: Lessons not learned as men – it’s always men – go to war
Gordon D’Arcy: Standards fell short against Wales, but there will be little unrest as players look to France
Is it better to get paid weekly or monthly?
LYNN McMAHON,
Dún Laoghaire,
Co Dublin.
