Sir, – A recent letter proposes giving pharmacists greater clinical autonomy in the supply of medicines for minor ailments (January 12th).
Whereas this proposal may appear to be a good idea that would take pressure off family doctors and give more job satisfaction to pharmacists, the proposal would not be straightforward.
Pharmacists receive little or no practical training in the examination of patients or in the diagnosis and management of illnesses, so that their training would have to undergo significant change before they were given the right to prescribe medications.
Secondly, most pharmacists in retail chain pharmacies sell alternative products such as anti-wrinkle creams, magnetic bracelets and homeopathic remedies alongside bona fide pharmaceuticals.
From Blair and Clinton to civil servants in the shadows, archive papers reveal scale of peace push
JFK’s four days in Ireland among happiest of his life, his father told De Valera
‘Buying the bank seemed daring’: how one couple transformed a rural bank branch into a home and business
Megan Nolan: A conversation with a man in his late 30s made clear the realities of this new era in my dating life
This confuses the public who assume that products endorsed by a pharmacist are of scientifically proven value.
Before we expand further the role of pharmacists in the science of medicine, we should ask them to commit to stop selling products that are unproven and unscientific. – Yours, etc,
Dr TOM O’ROURKE,
(Retired medical
practitioner),
Gorey, Co Wexford.