Sir, – I refer to Breda O’Brien’s very important article “Foley’s Leaving Cert Reform is untenable”, Opinion & Analysis, January 28th), in which she is severely critical of the Minister for Education’s policy to examine written paper one in English and Irish in the Leaving Certificate at the end of fifth year instead of sixth Year.
From the point of view of the pupil’s psychological development, their increased maturity at the end of sixth year means that they have much more to offer now by way of both accumulated learning and personal experience, and consequently can acquit themselves distinctly better after a further year.
There is also a serious risk that these two subjects would now be allowed to monopolise their work in fifth year, leaving little time or effort for the other subjects in that year.
Again, I suspect that, for the growing number of our students who seek to study at a university abroad following school-leaving here, the international currency value of their Irish Leaving Certificate could become devalued by the proposed shrinking of the duration of study in these two key areas. – Yours, etc,
Matt Williams: Take a deep breath and see how Sam Prendergast copes with big Fiji test
New Irish citizens: ‘I hear the racist and xenophobic slurs on the streets. Everything is blamed on immigrants’
Jack Reynor: ‘We were in two minds between eloping or going the whole hog but we got married in Wicklow with about 220 people’
‘I could have gone to California. At this rate, I probably would have raised about half a billion dollars’
DESMOND SWAN,
(Emeritus Professor
of Education,
University College Dublin),
Stillorgan,
Co Dublin.