Sir, – In comparing Dublin and Cork to Amsterdam, Berlin, Paris and London, David McWilliams has erroneously conflated the most dense square kilometre of these cities with the overall density of the city (“Decades of recurring housing crises remains a reality – penalising the young, rewarding the old”, Weekend, Opinion, January 28th). The article uses work by Prof Alistair Rae of the University of Sheffield, who was unfortunately not credited. The population density of Dublin city is approximately 5,046 people per square kilometre, not 4,665. Cork City’s population density is 1,300 people per square kilometre, not 3,300. Berlin’s population density is 4,117 people per square kilometre, not 23,379. Amsterdam City’s population density is 4,439 people per square kilometre, not 28,880. Finally, the population density of the city of Paris is 20,623 people per square kilometre, not 52,218.
In fact, the most dense square kilometre in Ireland is the same as the density of Monaco at about 12,500 people.
As can be seen Dublin compares favourably with several major cities often used as examples of appropriate urban population density. In addition, most of these cities have achieved these densities without seeing the need for a proliferation of high-rise residential buildings. They have, however, developed plenty of six storey apartment buildings, a scale the Department of Housing itself has recommended as the optimum height for achieving building affordability and density. – Yours, etc,
Dr LORCAN SIRR,
Matt Williams: Take a deep breath and see how Sam Prendergast copes with big Fiji test
New Irish citizens: ‘I hear the racist and xenophobic slurs on the streets. Everything is blamed on immigrants’
Jack Reynor: ‘We were in two minds between eloping or going the whole hog but we got married in Wicklow with about 220 people’
‘I could have gone to California. At this rate, I probably would have raised about half a billion dollars’
Senior Lecturer
in housing, planning
and development,
Technological
University Dublin,
Dublin 1.