Head2Head:Yes argues Ruth Cloherty, who says that alternative medicine can fill the gaps in the health service No argues Dr Brian Hughes, who says that alternative therapies simply do not work
Yes:Alternative therapies are a cheap and effective way of increasing wellbeing. Evidence from studies in the UK indicates that some complementary and alternative therapies are successfully filling in the gaps in effectiveness recognised in the National Health Service. Studies show that people who consult complementary practitioners usually have long-standing conditions for which conventional medicine has not provided a satisfactory solution. As Ireland is in a similar position, why don't we integrate the two systems and increase efficacy of health care as a whole?
Let's take a couple of specific examples where complementary approaches could help increase the quality of health-care provision. Stress has now been recognised by conventional medicine as a contributing factor in many chronic diseases. Research into many complementary therapies has demonstrated a positive effect on reducing levels of stress. Poor nutritional status is also now accepted as a key predisposing factor in many illnesses, as it has a direct effect upon cellular health.
Sceptics of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) believe any positive affects patients experience are due to the placebo effect. In many cases this is untrue - there is much evidence that cancer and heart disease respond well to, and can be prevented by, nutritional therapy, herbal medicine and other complementary therapies. They can all elicit physical changes within the body that cannot be explained away by the placebo effect. Even in more controversial cases, such as the use of acupuncture as an alternative to anaesthetic during surgery, magnetic resonance imaging has proven that acupuncture can slow down the physiological response to pain and acts on the pain matrix deep in the centre of the brain.
While there is scientific evidence to support the efficacy of acupuncture and nutritional therapy, complementary therapists readily accept that the placebo effect is a contributing (and potentially useful) factor in all areas of healthcare - including conventional medicine.
During randomly selected drug trials, there is often a significant number of people who respond positively to the sugar pill placebo. When we consider the known side effects that often come with prescription drugs, should we not be utilising the power of mind the placebo effect demonstrates alongside less aggressive complementary forms of treatment and save the drugs for only those who really need them? This placebo effect is not limited to drug trials; it has also been scientifically shown to be present in some surgical procedures.
The number of those who consult complementary practitioners is similar to the number of users of conventional healthcare. In both cases the majority of users are female. The users of complementary medicine tend to be in higher socio-economic groups and have higher levels of education than users of conventional care. This poses an interesting question about the equality of healthcare distribution. This is especially significant when we consider that it is more cost-effective to deliver complementary medicine than it is to deliver conventional medicine.
The NHS in the UK has various complementary medicine departments and clinics attached to hospitals as well as in the community. One acupuncture clinic based in London receives referrals from 175 GPs and carries out 20,000 treatments per year, each costing £4.70 (€7.00).
The delivery of a purely conventional healthcare service is becoming financially unsustainable. The healthcare system will be crippled if we don't integrate the most effective complementary and alternative practices such as acupuncture, osteopathy and nutritional therapy. The formation of national standards and a central register for CAM professions is under way and will enable the Health Service Executive to source highly qualified and experienced practitioners and therapists, thereby removing any concerns about the varying standards of therapists here.
With the increase in disabling chronic conditions in the younger generation, a change in how we live as well as in how we deliver health care is vital. Poor nutrition and unhealthy lifestyles are killing the nation. Scientific research shows there is good reason to integrate evidence-based therapies such as acupuncture and nutritional therapy into mainstream health care. As the common purpose in healthcare is to promote and maintain optimum health, it is important for all parties to make room for each other.
Ruth Cloherty is director of the Institute of Complementary and
Integrated Medicine
No:These therapies are alternative precisely because they don't work. When used in relation to medicine, the terms "complementary" and "alternative" certainly sound positive: the former implies co-operation and synergy; the latter autonomy, choice and the freedom to make your own decisions. Many of us think it admirable when two things complement each other, and we all know it is wise to shop around for alternatives. However, when making decisions about healthcare, it is generally advisable to look for more than euphemistic verbiage.
Discussions about complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) are often highly charged. For whatever reason, many people are positively disposed toward CAM. I think terminology certainly represents part of the explanation. Criticising something that is complementary or alternative can appear like standing up for narrowmindedness or conservatism. Being "anti-complementary" or "anti-alternative" just isn't fashionable.
However, the proliferation of CAM in Irish healthcare represents a triumph of euphemism over common sense. By definition, what makes a particular practice "complementary" or "alternative" in the first place is the fact that the majority of scientific studies have found it to be medically inert. Quite simply, CAM is not real medicine.
Thousands of studies have been conducted into acupuncture, chiropracty, homoeopathy and the like, and yet none of these practices has been conclusively shown to be effective. Imagine buying a washing machine that, in factory trials, was unable to remove dirt from clothes; or a new car that, during its development, not only failed safety checks but also failed even to move! This is where we are with CAM: acupuncture, homoeopathy and the rest of them have all been tested - and all have failed their tests. If any of them had passed, they would cease to be classified as either "complementary" or "alternative". Of course, none of this is a surprise to mainstream medical scientists. This is because CAM practices are based on theories of the body that make no sense in scientific terms. Many practices claim to be based on "energy systems" that have never been demonstrated to exist.
The most common response to the above is the cry, "But science cannot explain everything!" This is where the power of euphemism comes in. Criticising things that are "complementary" or "alternative" is portrayed as a sign of epistemological infallibility - scientists are accused of being a bunch of know-it-alls. In reality, scientists never claim to be able to explain everything. The entire practice of science is based squarely on the assumption that we do not have a full explanation for anything. This is why scientific research is, and always will be, necessary. The most effective point favouring CAM, however, is the large number of its consumers who believe it has benefited them. "It worked for me!" is a claim made with great frequency. Many people do indeed feel better after undergoing a CAM therapy. However, psychologically, there are several reasons why being treated by a practitioner - any practitioner - should lead to improvements in health.
Psychological research has shown that any intervention that makes a person feel less stressed, less rushed, more valued, or more confident will enhance their ability to overcome symptoms of illness. Put simply, psychological changes help precipitate biological ones. Both our cardiovascular and immune systems respond positively to the removal of stress. Studies indicate that stress reduction makes postoperative wounds heal faster and patients spend less time in hospital after treatment. However, psychosomatic effects, in general, are restricted to pain, inflammation, nausea and minor infections. And research shows that these are precisely the types of ailment CAM practitioners have most "success" with.
CAM treatments are medically inert but psychologically beneficial, which helps explain their modest reputations. However, any psychological boost will have the same effect as a CAM. The big problem is that CAM can lead people to disregard mainstream medicine altogether. Such avoidance can be dangerous and, in extreme cases, fatal.
Any modern healthcare system should eschew euphemistic seduction. Expenditure should be confined to activities shown to have a basis in reality and to confer direct medical benefits. Psychological support is certainly important in helping people recover from illness, but dressing it up in mysticism and pseudoscience is an expensive insult to the ill, and a poor reflection on our scientific literacy.
Dr Brian Hughes lectures in psychology at the National University of Ireland, Galway
online: join the debate@ www.ireland.com
Last week Catherine Egan-Morley and Tom O'Gorman debated the question: Should gay and lesbian couples be allowed to adopt children? Here is an edited selection of your comments
YES: As gays, our partner is taken into account when we apply for adoption in Ireland As a same sex couple we adopted a boy two years ago. Recently in school and in class with 32 others the teacher asked, "who goes to Mass every Sunday?" - our son was the only one. Another day she asked, "who can say the Our Father?" - our son was the only one. We rear our son in a safe, loving and caring environment. Why are people so hung up about what goes on in the bedroom? Joe Long, Ireland
NO: I am a young gay man but unlike most of my peers I am against gay/lesbian adoption. I firmly believe a child should be placed with a father-figure and a mother-figure. I also think that because of my sexual orientation, it is simply not possible for me to have children. If I was meant to have children then I would have been born straight. Peter, Ireland
YES: My partner and I are looking forward to the birth of our second child. There's nothing "experimental" about our family; we are two parents who use our contrasting qualities and skills to do the best job we can of childrearing. Here in Ontario, we can both be listed on the birth certificate as the parents from day one. If I were still in Ireland, my partner would have no legal relationship with the children she loves so much and looks after so well. I can't wait for the day Ireland acknowledges the reality, and normality, of families like ours. Emma Donoghue, Canada
NO. It wouldn't surprise me if the next topic discussed would be "which of the two male 'parents' should be allowed to breastfeed the new baby?" PC for the sake of being 'modern'. Martin Beirne, Ireland
YES: As a "straight" guy and father of three boys, I know that love is the greatest thing you can give a child and that is not conditional on your sexual orientation. I also have to ask myself the question: if one of my kids told me he was gay, and wanted to adopt a child, would I support him? Of course. To oppose this issue is to take a backwards step, exposing doubts about homosexual relations - and this is not the right direction to go. Turfcutter, Ireland
NO: Homosexuals be they gay or lesbian, should not be allowed to adopt children either as same sex partners or indeed if only one of them could become the legal parent The adoption of a child by two naturally heterosexual partners in a happy marriage is a wonderful thing and allows a child to flourish and grow as a good citizen. I cannot imagine the same is true for a child living in an unnatural environment with sexual deviants, such as for example, homosexuals These people cannot or do not reproduce as per the rest of us, and experimenting on children through gay adoption may well be disastrous. POC, Ireland
YES: What a sad statement. Your very use of words like "sexual deviants" reduces your argument to base hate-mongering. Are computers "natural"? Is surgery "natural"? ... Of course not, but you seem quite willing to accept them as part of a "normal" upbringing There are enough broken homes on in Ireland which, by your account, are "natural", so let's give the gays a chance - they can't do any worse a job! William, Ireland
NO: A gay man who insists on a male sexual partner does not regard men and women as perfect substitutes. A lesbian woman's desire for a female partner illustrates that she does not regard a man, even a feminine man, to be just as good as a woman Yet, advocates of same sex parenting claim that gender is irrelevant for the purposes of parenting This is an incoherent set of claims. Pat Gill, Ireland