The IRFU has confirmed that the union is not one of the sport’s governing bodies that faces a class action taken by former players with regard to suffering brain injury while playing the sport. A similar undertaking by American football players led to the National Football League (NFL) agreeing to an estimated $1 billion lawsuit settlement taken by approximately 4,500 retired players.
Proceedings are to be issued by legal firm Rylands Law on behalf of a group of professional and semi-professional players against World Rugby, the (English) Rugby Football Union (RFU) and the Welsh Rugby Union (WRU).
A spokesperson for the IRFU confirmed that “we are not part of that action.” The legal case involving a group of rugby players diagnosed with early-onset dementia and other irreversible neurological impairments now looks destined for the courts.
[ Gordon D’Arcy: Message on brain injuries is still not sinking inOpens in new window ]
The claimants, who include former Wales captain Ryan Jones, England’s 2003 World Cup-winning hooker Steve Thompson and former All Blacks prop Carl Hayman, argue that the sport’s governing bodies were negligent in that they failed to take reasonable action to protect players from permanent injury caused by repetitive concussive and sub-concussive blows.
Ireland v Fiji: TV details, kick-off time, team news and more
To contest or not to contest? That is the question for Ireland’s aerial game
Ciara Mageean speaks of ‘grieving’ process after missing Olympics
Denis Walsh: Steven Gerrard is the latest to show a glittering name isn’t worth much in management
A pre-action letter of claim was issued to the same governing bodies on behalf of a group of nine players in December 2020. The parties have been unable to agree on a settlement since then, so the matter now appears likely to end up in court. The issuing of proceedings will mean the court takes over the management of the cases, putting the matter on a formal pathway to trial.
Rylands said this application for a group litigation order is the biggest “class action” lawsuit to be launched outside the United States. In all Rylands represents more than 185 rugby union players aged in their 30s, 40s and 50s.
Jones, 41, a member of the British and Irish Lions squad on the 2005 tour of New Zealand, revealed his diagnosis with early-onset dementia and probable chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) in an interview with the Sunday Times this month.
[ New study finds rugby players’ brains affected in single seasonOpens in new window ]
He told the newspaper: “I feel like my world is falling apart. I am really scared because I’ve got three children and three stepchildren and I want to be a fantastic dad. I lived 15 years of my life like a superhero and I’m not. I don’t know what the future holds.
“I am a product of an environment that is all about process and human performance. I’m not able to perform like I could, and I just want to lead a happy, healthy, normal life. I feel that’s been taken away and there’s nothing I can do. I can’t train harder, I can’t play the referee, I don’t know what the rules of the game are any more.”
A statement from Rylands confirming the imminent issuing of proceedings concluded: “This claim isn’t just about financial compensation; it is also about making the game safer and ensuring current and former players get tested so that if they are suffering a brain injury they can get the clinical help they need.
“The players we represent love the game. We aim to challenge the current perceptions of the governing bodies, to reach a point where they accept the connection between repetitive blows to the head and permanent neurological injury and to take steps to protect players and support those who are injured.”
Rylands declined to comment on whether former Gloucester lock Ed Slater, who has been diagnosed with motor neuron disease, is part of the group involved in the action.
A World Rugby spokesperson, contacted before the announcement was made public, said: “As of Sunday afternoon, World Rugby has not been issued with a legal claim. It would be inappropriate to comment until we have received the formal details of any action being taken.”
Sources indicated the WRU felt it “impossible” to comment having not seen details of the claim.
