Kilmar Ábrego García, the man mistakenly deported from Maryland to El Salvador by the Trump administration, was flown back to the United States to face criminal charges of transporting illegal immigrants within the US, attorney general Pam Bondi said on Friday.
Mr Ábrego García’s return marked an inflection point in a case seized on by critics of President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown as a sign that the administration was disregarding civil liberties in its push to step up deportations.
Mr Ábrego García – a 29-year-old Salvadoran whose wife and young child in Maryland are US citizens – appeared in federal court in Nashville on Friday evening.
His arraignment was set for June 13th, when he will enter a plea, according to local media reports. Until then, he will remain in federal custody.
Friedrich Merz gets ready for Trump’s Oval Office endurance test
Determined not to let his murder silence him, friends of Dom Phillips finish his book on the Amazon
Elon Musk leaves Trump’s club, yet he was never quite part of it
Trump v Harvard: University faces existential battle against opponent that would have once been unimaginable
If convicted, he would be deported to El Salvador after serving his sentence, Ms Bondi said. The Trump administration has said Mr Ábrego García was a member of the MS-13 gang, an accusation that his lawyers deny.
Officials on Friday portrayed the indictment of Mr Ábrego García by a federal grand jury in Tennessee as vindication of their approach to immigration enforcement.
“The man has a horrible past, and I could see a decision being made, bring him back, show everybody how horrible this guy is,” Mr Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One, adding that it was the justice department that decided to bring Mr Ábrego García back.
According to the indictment, Mr Ábrego García worked with at least five co-conspirators as part of a smuggling ring to bring immigrants to the United States illegally, then transport them from the US-Mexico border to destinations in the country.
Mr Ábrego García often picked up migrants in Houston, making more than 100 trips between Texas and Maryland between 2016 and 2025, the indictment alleges.
It also accuses Mr Ábrego García of transporting firearms and drugs. According to the indictment, one of Mr Ábrego García’s co-conspirators belonging to the same ring was involved in the transportation of migrants whose tractor trailer overturned in Mexico in 2021, resulting in 50 deaths.
Mr Ábrego García’s lawyer, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, called the criminal charges “fantastical” and a “kitchen sink” of allegations.
“This is all based on the statements of individuals who are currently either facing prosecution or in federal prison,” he said. “I want to know what they offered those people.”
The indictment also led to a high-level resignation in the federal prosecutor’s office in Nashville, with news that Ben Schrader, chief of the criminal division for the Middle District of Tennessee, had resigned in protest.
A 15-year veteran of the US attorney’s Office, Mr Schrader had grown increasingly uncomfortable with the administration’s actions, and the indictment of Mr Ábrego García was “the final straw”, a person familiar with the situation told Reuters. Mr Schrader declined comment.
[ Riot police and anti-ICE protesters clash in Los Angeles after immigration raidsOpens in new window ]
Mr Ábrego García was deported on March 15th, more than two months before the charges were filed. He was briefly held in a mega-prison known as the Terrorism Confinement Center, despite a US immigration judge’s 2019 order barring him from being sent to El Salvador because he would likely be persecuted by gangs.
Ms Bondi said Salvadoran president Nayib Bukele had agreed to return Mr Ábrego García after US officials presented his government with an arrest warrant. “The grand jury found that over the past nine years, Ábrego García has played a significant role in an alien smuggling ring,” she told a press conference.
In a court filing on Friday, federal prosecutors asked a judge to keep Mr Ábrego García detained pending trial.
Citing an unnamed co-conspirator, prosecutors said Mr Ábrego García joined MS-13 in El Salvador by murdering a rival gang member’s mother. The indictment does not charge Mr Ábrego García with murder.
Mr Ábrego García could face 10 years in prison for each migrant he is convicted of transporting, prosecutors said, a punishment that potentially could keep him incarcerated for the rest of his life.
The case has become a symbol of escalating tensions between the Trump administration and the judiciary, which has blocked a number of the president’s signature policies. More recently, the US supreme court has backed Mr Trump’s hardline approach to immigration in other cases.
After Mr Ábrego García’s lawyers challenged the basis for his deportation, the court ordered the Trump administration to facilitate his return, with liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor saying the government had cited no basis for what she called his “warrantless arrest”.
US district judge Paula Xinis has opened an investigation into what, if anything, the Trump administration had done to secure his return, after Mr Ábrego García’s lawyers accused officials of stonewalling their requests for information. That led to concerns among Mr Trump’s critics that his administration would openly defy court orders.
In a court filing on Friday, justice department lawyers told Ms Xinis that Mr Ábrego García’s return meant they were in compliance with the order to facilitate bringing him back to the US.
Mr Sandoval-Moshenberg said Mr Ábrego García’s return did not mean the government was in compliance, asserting that his client must be placed in immigration proceedings before the same judge who handled his 2019 case.
Chris Van Hollen, a Democratic US senator from Maryland who visited Mr Ábrego García in El Salvador, said in a statement on Friday that the Trump administration has “finally relented to our demands for compliance with court orders and the due process rights afforded to everyone in the United States”.
“The administration will now have to make its case in the court of law, as it should have all along,” Mr Van Hollen said. – Reuters
